Page 1 of 1

Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 10:28 pm
by Coach
Can anyone contrast the difference between post oak and live oak, given that both are well seasoned and split? I usually cook with live oak, but I wonder if others prefer post oak, ala Franklin and Mueller BBQ.

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:52 pm
by Rambo
I've never used Live oak. i don't know what could be bad about it. Most of the Hill Country places use post oak

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:55 pm
by Stan41
In my opinion Live Oak makes too much Black smoke. Meat comes out black and with a very strong smoke taste. Besides dry Live Oak is very hard to cut or split.
Stan

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:26 pm
by 3 star redneck
My supplier carries both...the funny part is most restuarants around the metro-mess.. :dont: .....buy and prefer Live oak......they say it burns hotter longer.....but it tends to smoke very heavy if not seasoned well.......and the Post oak I have been using burnes good and fairly clean after the initial fire starts.......My favorite is Black Jack oak, but hard to find in North Central Tx........IMHO for Comp bbq the post oak is a msmoother milder smoke for most judges palates.... :wink: :D

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:18 am
by Coach
No doubt live oak must be very dry and split to burn clean. Jeff I am going pick up some post oak and I will keep on eye out for some black jack too. :twisted:

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:46 pm
by jtilk
I could be wrong on this but I think live oak seems to be a lil more dense than post oak as well. Maybe this explains the lasting longer thought.

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:17 pm
by Coach
I bought some well seasoned split post oak yesterday, so I will update y'all on my next cook how I think it compares to live oak. Thanks.

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:21 am
by exotool
Some say he's still BBQ'ing to this day.

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 2:42 pm
by Barbra
Major commercial species included in the white oak group are white (so this is a bit confusing), chestnut (leaks if used for liquid barrels), post, overcup, swamp chestnut, bur, chinkapin, Oregon white, and swamp white (really hard to dry swamp white without checks).

Included in the red oak group are northern red (often just called red, so a bit confusing), southern red, scarlet, Shumard, pin, black, cherrybark, water, laurel and willow.

Live oak is indeed a white oak, but its properties (including density, strength, interlocked grain, evergreen) are quite a bit different than the other commercial white oaks, so it might be best considered separately. Actually, there are several important species called live oak; they are all similar in properties.

There are around 20 commercial red oak species and 20 white oaks. A dendrologist might find that in North America we have over 100 species of oak.

For the most part, the species in the commercial red oaks are quite similar and also the commercial white oaks, so from a practical point of view, we do not separate them within a group (except live oak and sometimes California black oak). However, we do separate the oaks within a group into those with rings spaced about 1/4" or more apart from those with closer ring spacing. The wider spacing (sometimes called Southern, but not too accurate) is harder to dry, a bit more dense, and higher shrinkage, with some resulting processing differences.

Also, those oak trees with anaerobic bacterial infections will produce drying and strength issues. As the bacteria are more common in wet sites, and some oak species prefer wetter sites, we see more issues with the wide ring (Southern) oaks. As the species listed above are often found in one region of the country (northern or Appalachian, for example), we often say that one species is harder to dry than another, but it could be due to the higher risk of bacterial infection and not the wood itself.

Assignment writing structure: Look at tree or log quality factors (straight grain, growth rate, knots, color, shake or odor, sweepy log, etc.) rather than being overly concerned about the species within the white or red group.

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2018 2:59 pm
by OldUsedParts
WOW, that critique just makes me even happier that I use Charcoal and Pellets :laughing7: :lol: :D :whiteflag: :roll: :dont: :scratch:

Re: Post oak vs. live oak

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2019 1:52 pm
by allenayres
We seem to be getting a few 1-post wonders here...